Take-home Option for the Final

Section B: due Monday., Dec 10, at 3:00 p.m. 
Section A: due Tuesday., Dec 11, at 3:00 p.m. 
(in both paper and electronic form)

Directions:

Topics:

1. Social Relations: As a movie critic, evaluate how accurately the movie portrays 2-3 of the following the male/female relationships (Menelaus & Helen, Paris & Helen, Hector & Andromache, Achilles & Briseis). Use as your benchmark the male/female relationships in Kebric's chapter 7. (you may also use evidence from the Iliad and the Odyssey; but not instead of Kebric's chapter 7)

2. "Survivor: Ancient Greece I" on the "History" channel. Determine, based on the evidence and the criterion below, who would win and who not and why.
Three Contestants: Socrates, Alexander the Great, and Achilles or Hector or Agamemnon or Odysseus (from the movie)
Admissible Evidence: Plato's Apology for Socrates, Pomeroy for Alexander, the movie for Achilles, ...
Sole Criterion: the character of these individuals

3. "Survivor: Ancient Greece II" on the "History" channel. Determine, based on the evidence and the criterion below, who would win and who not and why.
Three Contestants: Socrates or Alexander the Great, and two of the following from the movie: Achilles, Hector, Agamemnon, Odysseus
Admissible Evidence: Plato's Apology for Socrates, Pomeroy for Alexander, the movie for Achilles, ...
Sole Criterion: the Homeric definition of kleos (start your paper with a brief definition of Homeric kleos and how one achieved it)

4.  Religion: At one point in the movie, Achilles says, "I chose nothing. I was born and this is who I am." One issue we have looked at throughout the semester is the issue of "fate (or the gods) vs free will." As a movie critic, evaluate the movie's stance on this issue versus Homer's stance (based  solely on the selections from Homer we read at the beginning of the semester) or Sophocles' stance (based solely on the Antigone)