Topics for Papers

Paper #1 topic

Directions:
  • e-mail me a copy (victor.leuci@westminster-mo.edu)
  • bring a paper copy to class
  • length: 600-1000
  • for more information about the format and about the writing intensive requirements, click here
  • a good paper will give examples from the various selections we have read and not just a narrow subsection
  • citations guide: give book and line numbers, i.e. (Il 1.453), at the end of each sentence where you refer to examples from the Iliad or the Odyssey; "Il" or "Ody" is only needed if it is not clear which poem the example comes from
  • FYI paraphrasing is just as good as quoting, but both need citations.
  • Write on one of the topics below:
    1.  It has been suggested that how the gods relate to humans can be described based on three pairs of opposites (Near/Far; Kind/Cruel; Just/self-seeking), i.e. the gods are sometimes kind to humans and sometimes cruel, sometimes just and sometimes self-seeking, etc. Pick one of these pairs and examine if there is any change between the Iliad and the Odyssey in how the gods relate to humans.

    2. 
    When all the Greeks meet in assemblies in books 1 and 2 of the Iliad and when the Ithacans in book 2 of the Odyssey, what are the range of accepted actions for the commoners as compared to that for the "nobles/chiefs?"


     
     

    Paper #2 topic

    Directions:
  • e-mail me a copy (victor.leuci@westminster-mo.edu)
  • bring a paper copy to class
  • length: 600-1000
  • for more information about the format and about the writing intensive requirements, click here
  • Write on one of the topics below:currently unavailable
    1. Many points of comparison can be made between the ancient Greek Olympics and the modern Olympics. Discuss some of the significant similarities and differences with regard either to the winners of the events or to the athletes in general (excluding what happens if one wins). As always, make sure you cite sufficiently and correctly.

    2.  Does the material related to women, covered in Kebric's chapters 3 and/or 4, confirm the position or roles or duties of women as seen in the Iliad and the Odyssey? [reminder: when citing from the Iliad or the Odyssey, see directions for paper 1; when citing from Kebric's book, give the author and page number, e.g. Kebric 92. If Kebric is citing a Greek writer, indicate that in the body of the sentence)


     
     
     

     
    Paper #3 topic
    Directions:
  • e-mail me a copy (victor.leuci@westminster-mo.edu)
  • bring a paper copy to class
  • length: 600-1000
  • header: don't forget to include a word count
  • citing: use the numbers at the beginnings of "paragraphs"
  • for more information about the format and about the writing intensive requirements, click here
  • Write on one of the topics below:
    1.  You have come into possession of a time portal that will allow you to visit the past (but without affecting the time continuum), but it has some restrictions. You must submit your request in writing to the portal and demonstrate that you have good cause to visit (or it may refuse your request). Based solely on all the selections of Herodotus' Histories assigned for class, determine and demonstrate which it would be better to visit the past as -- Miltiades or Leonidas. Remember, the portal is very particular about whom it lets go through and requires a request that contains good argumentation and good supporting facts (and includes reasons why one is preferred over the other).

    2. The selected readings from Herodotus' Histories have been broken into 5 categories. Examine to what extent events happen becaused they are caused by the actions of the gods or by the actions of humans, using one of the "battle" selections (Marathon,  Thermopylae) and one of the others (Intro & Gyges, Croesus & Delphi, Hellespont & Punishment). Make sure you indicate what the significance of your findings are.

    Paper #4 topic
    Directions:
  • e-mail me a copy (victor.leuci@westminster-mo.edu)
  • bring a paper copy to class
  • length: 600-1000
  • citing: use the page numbers in our text
  • if you wish to cite the web article, use the authors name in parentheses and add the following for works cited: Williams, Lance. "Bonds' defense: Lawyer may have talked his client into a corner." San Francisco Chronicle.  17 Nov 2007. SFGate.com. date accessed <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/17/MNU7TE98P.DTL>
  • for more information about the format and about the writing intensive requirements, click here
  • Write on the following topic:
    1. Barry Bonds has made the news recently with his indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice. A recent SF Chronicle article has noted that Bonds' lawyer may have been too "combative" and that his "confrontational style" may be a problem for Bonds. Is this an issue for Socrates in his defense speeches in the Apology? In other words, using only the first two speeches in the Apology, (pp 19-36, 36-38) examine whether Socrates' manner of defending himself, first against the charges, then with regard to what penalty he should suffer, contributed to his conviction and penalty of death.

    2.
    Assume you are one of the prosecutors of Socrates. Write a brief speech that uses evidence from his three speeches in the Apology that would help your case against him. Recall that the actual charges are "Socrates is a doer of evil, and corruptor of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the state, and has other new divinities of his own" (p 25).  If you wish, you may also include evidence that supports the unofficial charges that "Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others" (p 21). [FYI: make sure you have a sufficient number of good examples of evidence in your speech].


    Paper #5 topic
    Directions:
  • e-mail me a copy (victor.leuci@westminster-mo.edu)
  • bring a paper copy to class
  • length: 600-1000
  • for more information about the format and about the writing intensive requirements, click here
  • Write on one of the following topics: c
    1. Assume that there was an ancient Athenian version of Survivor and it is down to the final three contestants. Which of the three would win and why? You make pick the final three from the following pool: Socrates, the different Athenians discussed in Kebric's Chapter 7. Make sure you base your conclusions only on the evidence provided in the Apology  (if Socrates is one of your choices) and Kebric, Ch 7.

    2. One of the first aims of a speech at a trial is to win the trust of the jurors. Based on the parts of the speeches in Kebric's Chapter 7, examine whether this has been done (or not) for any two (or three) of the law cases examined in the chapter.

     

    Optional Paper #6 topic

    Directions:
  • e-mail me a copy (victor.leuci@westminster-mo.edu)
  • bring a paper copy to class
  • length: 600-1000
  • for more information about the format and about the writing intensive requirements, click here
  • Write on one of the following topics:
    1.  You have come into possession of a time portal that will allow you to visit the past (but without affecting the time continuum), but it has some restrictions. You must submit your request in writing to the portal and demonstrate that you have good cause to visit (or it may refuse your request). Based solely on the both plays determine and demonstrate which you would want to go back as -- Haemon or Ismene or Creon from the Antigone or a minor individual in the Lysistrata (that has a speaking part and enough information about him/her; e.g. obviously the baby has too small of a part!)-- with a focus on their "character" or "nature"  (write on both of the individuals, not one). Remember, the portal is very particular about whom it lets go through and requires a request that contains good argumentation and good supporting facts.

    2.   Antigone died as a result of her strong-willed actions whereas Lysistrata was celebrated. Besides the fact that one was in a tragedy and the other in a comedy, why are both endings fitting for the "character" of each?
    3. (not available yet)